On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 12:04, Marco Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> This proposal aims to reduce the IPv4 allocation size to a /24 once the
> RIPE NCC is unable to allocate contiguous /22 ranges.
>

Is it worth having a period of handing out two or three (potentially
non-contiguous) /24s when the last complete /22 disappears, before moving
to just a single /24 (with a step at 2 if we start at 3)?

I can see the logic between the change in sizes, I'm just wondering if
there was a case for intermediatory steps to reduce the pain

Either way, I support the proposal with or without this change

Thx

J

-- 

James Blessing
07989 039 476

Reply via email to