> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thamer Al-Harbash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [admin] CLUE Projects
>
>
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Mark Lane wrote:
>
> > The biggest problem is some many Linux guys are self taught which
> > would
> > make it hard to determine who qualifies as a full member
> and who doesn't.
>
> If you really want to do this just assemble a panel of people
> who have proven professional experience (I'll be willing to
> volunteer), and then we can come up with a few _good_ guidelines.
Woohoo! Our first volunteer.
>
> These may include:
>
> (1) Past participation in OSS.
> (2) Past participation in a LUG or similar organization.
> (3) N number of years of proven experience as an IT professional.
>
> Incidently self-taught people tend to be more clueful and
> more passionate. If you're going to go for certifications and
> academic achievements you'll just get lots of drones who want
> a piece of the pie -- as well as some clueful people.
Perhaps SIG membership (as a subset of CLUE) could have criteria for
membership that are a little more rigid. I like your criteria, seems fair.
#1 includes things such as bug testing, documentation, etc. right?
>
> --
> Thamer Al-Harbash http://www.whitefang.com/
> Alpha Geek of the Toronto UNIX Cabal:
> "Perfection is a lead pipe and one sorry Poser."
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
