I've spent most of my life in male-dominated activities, first racing 
motorcycles, now in computers and Linux. I have never once had the 
desire to relegate myself to the "powder-puff" class.

I do what I do because I have a passion for it. I don't want to be 
separated because of my gender. If a person just does what they do, and 
does it well, I've found that gender isn't even an issue.

The bigger problem is possibly that some young women are still focusing 
on what have been historically male-dominated areas and are seeing this 
as an obstacle.

Segregating them is not going to help the problem. They've got to just 
know that they can come out and do what they do and that gender doesn't 
even come into it. They don't need their own private club.

- Anita


Thamer Al-Harbash wrote:
> I'm serious:
> 
> http://www.osdn.com/bcg/bcg/img25.html
> 
> Females compromise %2 of the OSS hackers surveyed. A good portion of
> them would probably be into documentation or website design or Perl
> scripting. In other words maybe one or two do actual hacking.
> 
> I'd love to get a SIG together that possibly recruits directly from
> schools and nerdy female organizations to get real Hackeresses
> together in a room. I'd like to see that survey show %50 male.
> 
> It would _probably_ better for a female to take charge, but I'll
> volunteer my services till someone else can take over.
> 
> Someone mentioned to me that a similar initiative was taken by
> OCLUG. Any ideas on who I can speak to? Also, how many people in
> Toronto would be interested in hosting/setting up such a thing?
> 
> Any ideas where to advertise?
> 


-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCM/E/CC/CS/B/IT/ d+ s: a40 C++++ ULB++++ P+>+++++ L++++ E--- W+++ N+++ 
o? K- w !O M !V PS PE Y++ PGP+++ t++@ 5+ X++ R* tv-- b+ DI+ D G++>+++++ 
e++ h---- r++++ x++++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to