1.      “first we convert footage to monochrome/grey scale, then drop in a
sepia effect (red giant/magic bullet), then the 3rd pass is the
scratches/hair for the old film look”
 
Keying off of your use of the word “then”, note you don’t have to actually
apply effects to the clips in any particular order, you only have to ensure
the stacking order in the Effect Controls panel is correct. Note you can
drag effects up and down in the Effect Controls panel. This is useful when
you want to experiment or try some what-ifs.
 
Lee
 
 
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Adriane
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 9:41 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [AP] Re: render vs export ( WAS "crashing again- background
programs?")
 
  
Lee,
thanks as usual for your thorough reply. i have not read it all carefully
yet since i am at work, but i can answer a few of your questions:
the clips we are trying to render are less than a minute. I have details at
home on exactly how many frames & how far it got before freezing.
The effects in question: it's actually 3 layered effects i guess. first we
convert footage to monochrome/grey scale, then drop in a sepia effect (red
giant/magic bullet), then the 3rd pass is the scratches/hair for the old
film look. these are being done 1 at a time, rendered, then put the next
effect on. i realize this is quite processor intensive- does the rendering
process have to re-render each
effect each time- like-is it rendering all 3 levels of effects every time? i
tend to think not- what's done is done- and now we change it again- but i'm
not sure.
graphics card is an Nvidea- can't recall the model right now- but it is a 1
gb card.

the processor is the i7-920 btw, and i'm thinking the ram is the DDR3
variety-but don't quote me on that yet! 
And we are using CS4- for some reason I thought we had 5. does that make a
difference in that we are using the 64-bit version of Windows 7? 
I'm hoping for an "AHA" moment here...

looking forward to the next round of diagnostics from you- this is actually
quite interesting to me. By the way- my husband is the "artist" of our team
in this case- he just wants to film & edit
without all this technical "nonsense". I am pretty much the "tech-girl"
since i know more about that end of things (not nearly as much as the folks
here in the group).

--- In [email protected]
<mailto:Adobe-Premiere%40yahoogroups.com> , Lee Menningen <l_mennin...@...>
wrote:
> 
> Adriane mentioned that manually rendering, even in bits and pieces, fails,
> unless the duration selected is very short, but no mention was made re:
how
> short these were. We do know the timeline is 18 minutes and that it cannot
> be rendered in one pass. 
> 
> Adriane also stated "there are many cuts & effects to render", which
> suggests a lot of memory will be required. But that machine has 8gb so
PPro
> should have up to four 2gb blocks available, I think. So what is going
> wrong?
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Adobe-Premiere/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Adobe-Premiere/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to