You know that Adobe Media Encoder renders in the back ground and you can carry on with other work, so why worry about a few minutes longer rendering time. Most importantly you should go for the best possible quality. BTW the Pal standard is Lower Field, no idea what it is for NTSC. Uwe
> Dear Neil, > > Yes it was that. When rendering I changed the "as source" and set > "lower" and when rendered the blinds were not there anymore. > The downside is that for rendering a 21 minutes video it took 45 > minutes! Note that when left "as source" it was rendering "upper" and > took 25 minutes only. So my "lower" solution took me 20 minutes more! I > suppose this is normal, but frustrating also. > > Cheers, > > */Leonel Dolara/* > > *Actor y Director* > > *leoneldolara.webs.com <http://www.leoneldolara.webs.com/>* > > El 29/06/2011 10:51, BEDFORD NEIL escribió: > > Hello Leonel, > > > > Sounds like interlace problems to me. > > It could be that the screen you are viewing it on just doesn't do > > interlace. Try playing it with Windows Media Player or VLC to see if > that > > makes any change (or another viewer at least). > > > > If not, try that G-Spot (free) program to see what the original > exactly is > > and try to keep the outputted file the same. Personally, if the HD > version > > is OK, I would convert that using one of the free converters and try > to keep > > all the settings (apart from the codec of course) as close as possible, > > aspect ratio etc. In the field selection I think its upper first for PAL > > and lower for NTSC however if you re-encode in Adobe PP. > > > > Your almost there now... > > > > Cheers, > > Neil. > > > > On 29 June 2011 14:09, Leonel Dolara<[email protected] > <mailto:leoneldolara%40gmail.com>> wrote: > > > >> ** > >> > >> > >> Dear Greg and Neil, > >> > >> Thanks a lot for your clarifying answers. Yes, all the computers that I > >> tested on with the HD version of the movie where kind of old and no > more > >> than one core for them. I myself have a quad core so of course it could > >> play > >> it well. > >> I have just tested the MPG version on the old ones and it plays > very well, > >> so my problem is solved. And I understand and agree with you both > about the > >> explanations for the files to be the same size. And when I rendered > in mpg > >> I > >> used Maximum bitrate and Maximum everything (8mbps of video) so the mpg > >> file > >> could have been smaller. > >> > >> Just one more little question: on the mpg version I found that the > faces of > >> the movie shot originally in HD are a bit pixelated (it shows on > the faces > >> because they move, but I guess it is all the frame. You get to see > >> horizontal lines when the faces move as if there were a transparent > blind > >> before them) , as if the deinterlace is done wrong (I guess). Could > that be > >> that I selected it in upper and should be lower? For the record is > not the > >> natural blurness that you see in a mpg video compared to the HD > version, > >> it's something else. > >> > >> Thank you all! > >> > >> > >> 2011/6/29 BEDFORD NEIL<[email protected] > <mailto:barrymung%40ntlworld.com>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Adobe-Premiere/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Adobe-Premiere/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
