I have tried to reclamate a copypool that was present in the library and
readwrite.
The system still insisted to use the data on onsites.
I'm currently at 3.1.2.20 going to 3.1.7.3.
Maybe I was hallucinating. :-) But you should check this out.
Hope this helps. let me know! ...
joe.f.
Joseph A Faracchio, Systems Programmer, UC Berkeley
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Lawrence Clark wrote:
> I think what is normal is to have a primary copy and copypool copies that go offsite
>on a daily basis. After a while there is a lot of overhead in maintaining the offsite
>copy, especially reclaims of copypool volumes that are physically offsite.
>
> In our situation we are adding a second tape library to house copypool volumes.
>Reclamation of them will then be cartridge to cartridge instead of multiple mounts
>from the primary storage pool. We expect to house the copypool tape library in a
>separate building using fibre card onnections in the tape library for the drives.
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/11/00 12:06PM >>>
> Is it safe to say that you need both offsite and onsite copies as well as
> the primary copies or should it be a business decision?
>
> Thanks in Advance
>
