Ilja We have some of our database volumes on the shark and I still mirror my db volumes. You mirror not only to protect from disk errors but also to protect from corruption. I believe that there was a discussion recently of someone who had a corrupted database volume. A shark will not protect you from that becky
-----Original Message----- From: Ilja G. Coolen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM Database Location Well Jonathan, This is how we do it. We are running on an AIX box for starters. We have our 4 DB volumes on an separate filesystem. This is about 40GB in total having 20 GB extendable. We do not mirror the DB volumes, because the ESS provides all the redundancy we could need. No pain in case of disk crashes. No management burden. Leaves more resources to TSM. Our database has a 50% mutation daily, but we manage to keep up a 98% to 99% cache hit ratio. This high mutation level made us decide to do a full DB backup twice a day. We also do a daily reset of all the utilization values. All our disk storage pool volumes also are on the same ESS, but in different filesystems. These total to about 900 GB. We have 2 fibre channel connections directly attached to the ESS. No SAN yet. Both FC connections are based on redundancy and load-balancing using IBM's subsystem device driver (shipped with the ESS). The ESS disks look the same as local disks to an AIX box, so we simply put the ESS disks in AIX volume groups/logical volumes/file systems. Assumingin you know something about the ESS: Inside the ESS whe have defined our 4 (DB) disks on 4 different loops (2 ranks or 8 packs) so we have 2 hot-spare disks available for each DB volume. This also provides the best possible performance. So Jonathan. Put your primary DB volumes on an ESS, and you don't need any mirrors. Let us know what you decide to do. Have fun. greetings, Ilja Coolen. -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Jonathan Siegle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden: woensdag 24 april 2002 17:03 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Re: TSM Database Location On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Ilja G. Coolen wrote: > Hi, > > I'd suggest to move it to it's own filesystem placed on an redundant disk > array, enjoying high performance and recoverability. > We placed our database volumes on an ESS subsystem. Where you place it is > your own choice. Just try to achieve redundancy. Did you put all primary/copy db volumes on the ESS? What kind of db cache hit are you getting? How are you talking to the ESS and how much other stuff is talking to the ESS while TSM is running? I am considering using the 2nd/3rd copy of the db for DRM purposes on an ESS. > > > Have fun. > > > > Ilja G. Coolen > > > _____ > > ABP / USZO > CIS / BS / TB / Storage Management > Telefoon : +31(0)45 579 7938 > Fax : +31(0)45 579 3990 > Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Intranet > : Storage Web > <http://intranet/cis_bstb/html_content/sm/index_sm.htm> > > _____ > > - Everybody has a photographic memory, some just don't have film. - > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Brenda Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Verzonden: woensdag 24 april 2002 13:37 > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: TSM Database Location > > > We are just setting up a new TSM server. It appears to load the default > database under /opt/tivoli/tsm/server/bin. Is it common practice to leave > it there or to move it to it's own separate location? Any recommendations? > > Thanks, > Brenda > Jonathan Siegle Center for Academic Computing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Penn State University 814-865-5840 University Park, Pa 16802
