If you are quoting Wayne Liquorman why are you asking such simplistic questions here?
the answers were already given it's just ego that wants to verify them so it can have a survival advantage ego still can't get it has to die to survive there is the paradox On 20 June 2010 20:03, jp EnlightenmentGuy <[email protected]> wrote: > " We’re once again thinking in terms of enlightened meat - that this > piece of meat meets that piece of enlightened meat, and then we > compare the meat: Are the qualities of this hunk of meat similar to > the qualities of that hunk of meat? What I’m telling you is that > they’re meat. This is meat [pointing] That’s meat and that’s meat. > THERE IS NO ENLIGHTENED MEAT. Enlightenment, as we talk about it, is > transcendent of the meat. " > > - Wayne Liquorman > > > > On Jun 20, 1:33 pm, godszen <[email protected]> wrote: >> realizing you are attention does not make you enlightened > -- ________________________________________________________ The contents of this email and context of the message contained within are intended for the recipient only. You may not copy, or redistribute the contents of this email without the express, written consent of the author. join the discussion: http://nonpluralism.com schedule me to speak at your event: http://mark.ty-wharton.com get my book now on Amazon UK/US tweet with me @mark_tywharton
