Ya, ya.......ya, ya........ could we get back to my post "very angry"?
On Jul 29, 6:39 am, Marcus <[email protected]> wrote: > . > > I wondered who would challenge the assumption that in principle, we > all agree. > > Bit of a shock .............. > > This is not a superficial view, but the simple fact that this > suject's discussions continue, proves that on a base level. We are > of a similar mind. Put another way. We agree because we are still > here. We continue to debate the same affect. > > Of course superficially …………….. you must disagree, of course, but > please accept, these communications continue. > > The discourse remains ………….. > > . > > On Jul 29, 12:13 pm, Rodger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > "We all agree this self illusion is created by each of us on a daily > > basis". > > > Do we? > > > On Jul 29, 6:07 am, Marcus <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > . > > > > Communicate > > > > Dictionary entry overview: What does communicate mean? > > > • COMMUNICATE (verb) > > > The verb COMMUNICATE has 7 senses: > > > 1. transmit information > > > 2. transmit thoughts or feelings > > > 3. transfer to another > > > 4. join or connect > > > 5. be in verbal contact; interchange information or ideas > > > 6. administer communion; in church > > > 7. receive Communion, in the Catholic church > > > Familiarity information: COMMUNICATE used as a verb is common. > > > > Dictionary entry details > > > > “transmit thoughts or feelings;” > > > > Words are to communicate, to share some parts of you/me/us. Like > > > sharing bread or wine. Opppppps that was someone else. > > > > These word games we play are useful development. If the heart and > > > mind are in agreement and eyes are open to see. These words do > > > communicate a new message. Not any particular topic or individual. > > > But underline essence of a new attitude, which gives rise to a new > > > feeling. A new feeling of unity with this universe and awareness of > > > a direct connection to the whole. > > > > We all agree this self illusion is created by each of us on a daily > > > basis. But within our illusions is netting which imposes constants. > > > Like we all must exist to contemplate existence. We must eat, sleep > > > shit and reproduce. We must battle against our own nature to uncover > > > own true nature. We must understand darkness, to appreciate light. > > > These are a few of the constants which bind all mankind. Allways > > > has, always will. > > > > In this sense, We are not different ……………….. These discussions can > > > inspire, if you let it. > > > > . > > > > On Jul 29, 11:24 am, Rodger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > If I have understood your starter post,communication is a natural > > > > urge.If that is correct,no excuse is needed. > > > > Early on,prior to written communication,when we were out hunting > > > > something to eat, certain signals were used to communicate the > > > > presence/location of whatever it was we were hunting...or whatever > > > > might turn and hunt us.To possibly save you from being eaten I might > > > > signal you to go left rather than right.Without that excuse(as you > > > > call it)you might end up as food for a saber tooth.But,I signaled > > > > you...with intent/purpose...for a reason.Which could've been...if we > > > > didn't bring home some bacon,I would still have to put on in the > > > > pot. :) > > > > > On Jul 29, 4:58 am, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > to communicate a meaning is an excuse to communicate > > > > > You need something to throw if you have the urge to throw. I think > > > > > the searching for meaning comes from the need to communicate. If you > > > > > communicate meaningful shit it is like throwing to a bigger distance. > > > > > > > > > > Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Rodger <[email protected]> > > > > > > Sender: [email protected] > > > > > Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:53:15 > > > > > To: Advaita-Zen<[email protected]> > > > > > Subject: Re: why we conceptualize the unconceptualizable > > > > > > About your conclusion,Marko... > > > > > > Through the written you have intended to communicate a > > > > > meaning,haven't you? > > > > > > On Jul 28, 11:27 pm, Marko Gregoric <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Words again, ooh fuck! I am boring > > > > > > > I found my self generating the bullshit I am going to write now and > > > > > > most of > > > > > > all I found "the source" of talking and creating all this shit. > > > > > > The source is as I said a million times is the urge of > > > > > > communication. I > > > > > > think that's almost an instinct of men being social animals. > > > > > > Did you ever notice that the world, all concepts, ideas... are in > > > > > > fact there > > > > > > just for the pure communication between people? > > > > > > I think the very existence of words comes out of that. > > > > > > I need to talk with you so I have to "word" it. > > > > > > Let's take the example of awareness. Where and what is awareness > > > > > > when there > > > > > > is no need to rationalize, put in words, explain. > > > > > > Here the point is not what is awareness or if it exists or not. I > > > > > > am not > > > > > > interested in that. What I am interested is: > > > > > > Why am I writing this post? > > > > > > Because I need to communicate with you. > > > > > > My conclusion is that the meaning of the written is not really > > > > > > important as > > > > > > much as is the fact the we need to talk. > > > > > > > ps Would there be any "Parabrahman" if gurus had not have the urge > > > > > > to speak > > > > > > to people? > > > > > > > So I think the source of the universe is that very social urge to > > > > > > talk about > > > > > > it.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -
