Marcus, that was just a feeble attempt at humour. You obviously saw the hypocricy in that.
What made me think was GZ's post, 'A still mind takes much less effort'. My mind only thinks about me and the immediate next, but when one sees the saints and the masters surrounded by followers asking hundreds of questions, on the face of it their minds must be busier. I have only my own problems to worry about, but the masters have the whole world to worry about, followers non followers alike. So I thought maybe someone will come forward and clarify. On Aug 5, 12:36 pm, Marcus <[email protected]> wrote: > . > > In a world of non-duality, this perfect synchronise singularity. > Each apparent event is elemental of the whole. The coin apparently > has two sides but in reality is a single coin only. It’s apparent > sides can-not exist independently. > > This principle in mind. The chicken and egg are one. The question > is a brain teaser. Because it has no cognitive answer. > > Anandanand, good to see your words once again. > > Please explain “This is the main reason I refused > enlightenment.” ??? > > It’s the first time I heard of enlightenment being rejected. > > . > > On Aug 5, 5:42 am, Anandanand <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Maybe the 'real' enlightened one is a business person...an employer of > > > wood choppers and water carriers? > > > Is that how it is? I thought before enlightenment chop (your own) > > wood, carry (your own) water. After enlightenment chop (every one > > elses') wood and carry (every one elses') water. This is the main > > reason I refused enlightenment. > > > On Aug 4, 11:46 pm, Rodger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Can be rough on the back,too,Amar...if you have to chop wood and carry > > > water. > > > Maybe the 'real' enlightened one is a business person...an employer of > > > wood choppers and water carriers? :) > > > > On Aug 4, 12:09 pm, amar s chauhan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > yeah u r right > > > > enlightenment is alwas rough on brain > > > > > On 8/4/10, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > after enlightenment,,everything is same except "think" and awareness > > > > > > I think your enlightenment was a bit rough on your brain cos you lost > > > > > the > > > > > ability to write meaningful sentences. > > > > > >> On 8/4/10, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > There is the Self in everything. > > > > >> > There are other concepts of soul called Jeevatma which is the > > > > >> > person > > > > >> > thinking of himself as a seperate entity. > > > > >> > I think after enlightment, the Jeevatma does not exist anymore. The > > > > >> person > > > > >> > does not exist. > > > > >> > But the supreme personality exists in everyone and everything. > > > > >> > The egg has a soul because consciousness is in everything. > > > > > >> > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:57 PM, a-symetrical > > > > >> > <[email protected]> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > >> >> does egg has a soul inside?what u guys say about its probability? > > > > > >> >> On Aug 4, 8:12 pm, Mahakali <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> >> > The chicken came first because , unlike the egg, it has a > > > > >> >> > protein > > > > >> >> > necessary to the formation of eggs. > > > > > >> >> > See The Metrohttp:// > > > > >> >>www.metro.co.uk/news/835020-the-chicken-came-first-not-the-egg... > > > > > >> >> > Much love... > > > > > >> >> > Kali > > > > > >> >> > On Aug 4, 4:35 pm, Marcus <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> >> > > I’ am interested to see how this goes, > > > > > >> >> > > What came first, the chicken or the egg ????????????? > > > > > >> >> > > All comments welcome. > > > > > >> >> > > .- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -
