. Roomsearching why ???
“It may show that you are an ignoranus in spiritual matters as well.” Your words can be so elegant and inspiring. Why do you repeatedly destroy your magic. What forces inside you create beauty, then spoil it. The insults roomsearching, why ??? . On Aug 5, 12:54 pm, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Anandanand <[email protected]> wrote: > > Marcus, that was just a feeble attempt at humour. > > You obviously saw > > the hypocricy in that. > > hypocrisy is the right spelling although you were pretty close. No negative > points for that. > Definitely better than mistery. > > > > > What made me think was GZ's post, 'A still mind takes much less > > effort'. > > Ramana has said "You are. So just be". The mind always wants to jump into > action. > > > My mind only thinks about me and the immediate next, > > Thinking happens because of hunger and sexual desire. > It cannot be avoided. Basic needs will always create basic thoughts. > Your body will constantly crave for food. If that is satisfied, thoughts > will subside. > > > but when > > one sees the saints and the masters surrounded by followers asking > > hundreds of questions, on the face of it their minds must be busier. > > Saints are not trying to win followers. The followers are there to find the > magic solution to solve all their problems. > The saint just removes their greed by his own example of humility. Saints > are just simple people. > And everyone starts to like such people because a simple man represents all > humanity. > > > I > > have only my own problems to worry about, but the masters have the > > whole world to worry about, followers non followers alike. > > The masters do not worry about the world. For them there is no world. > They are always immersed in the joy of pure being. That joy is what attracts > people to them. > The saints do not give a shit about humanity as such because most humans are > irritating egoistic bitches. > But Saints do have the compassion and try not to interfere with the > stupidity which society is indulging in. > > > > > So I thought maybe someone will come forward and clarify. > > I am trying to clarify some of your stupid ideas about the world. > May God be with me. > > > > > > > On Aug 5, 12:36 pm, Marcus <[email protected]> wrote: > > > . > > > > In a world of non-duality, this perfect synchronise singularity. > > > Each apparent event is elemental of the whole. The coin apparently > > > has two sides but in reality is a single coin only. It’s apparent > > > sides can-not exist independently. > > > > This principle in mind. The chicken and egg are one. The question > > > is a brain teaser. Because it has no cognitive answer. > > > > Anandanand, good to see your words once again. > > > > Please explain “This is the main reason I refused > > > enlightenment.” ??? > > > > It’s the first time I heard of enlightenment being rejected. > > > > . > > > > On Aug 5, 5:42 am, Anandanand <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Maybe the 'real' enlightened one is a business person...an employer > > of > > > > > wood choppers and water carriers? > > > > > Is that how it is? I thought before enlightenment chop (your own) > > > > wood, carry (your own) water. After enlightenment chop (every one > > > > elses') wood and carry (every one elses') water. This is the main > > > > reason I refused enlightenment. > > > > > On Aug 4, 11:46 pm, Rodger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Can be rough on the back,too,Amar...if you have to chop wood and > > carry > > > > > water. > > > > > Maybe the 'real' enlightened one is a business person...an employer > > of > > > > > wood choppers and water carriers? :) > > > > > > On Aug 4, 12:09 pm, amar s chauhan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > yeah u r right > > > > > > enlightenment is alwas rough on brain > > > > > > > On 8/4/10, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > after enlightenment,,everything is same except "think" and > > awareness > > > > > > > > I think your enlightenment was a bit rough on your brain cos you > > lost the > > > > > > > ability to write meaningful sentences. > > > > > > > >> On 8/4/10, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> > There is the Self in everything. > > > > > > >> > There are other concepts of soul called Jeevatma which is the > > person > > > > > > >> > thinking of himself as a seperate entity. > > > > > > >> > I think after enlightment, the Jeevatma does not exist > > anymore. The > > > > > > >> person > > > > > > >> > does not exist. > > > > > > >> > But the supreme personality exists in everyone and everything. > > > > > > >> > The egg has a soul because consciousness is in everything. > > > > > > > >> > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:57 PM, a-symetrical < > > [email protected]> > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > >> >> does egg has a soul inside?what u guys say about its > > probability? > > > > > > > >> >> On Aug 4, 8:12 pm, Mahakali <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > >> >> > The chicken came first because , unlike the egg, it has a > > protein > > > > > > >> >> > necessary to the formation of eggs. > > > > > > > >> >> > See The Metrohttp:// > > >www.metro.co.uk/news/835020-the-chicken-came-first-not-the-egg... > > > > > > > >> >> > Much love... > > > > > > > >> >> > Kali > > > > > > > >> >> > On Aug 4, 4:35 pm, Marcus <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> >> > > I’ am interested to see how this goes, > > > > > > > >> >> > > What came first, the chicken or the egg ????????????? > > > > > > > >> >> > > All comments welcome. > > > > > > > >> >> > > .- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
