is that so?
On Aug 24, 2:52 pm, Kuber Technologies <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:39 PM, fearlessinquirer > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Hey KT, > > > The eye (I) that sees cannot speak for it has no mouth. The mouth that > > speaks cannot see for it is not eye (I). > > How about .........the thought which created that assertion .......was never > thunk. > > :-) > > > > > Words can only point to ultimate truth, but never are ultimate truth, > > and intellectual understanding without directly realizing the truth > > through one's own investigation is not enough. > > Aw shucks > > And that there is nothing as "progress" was being bandied about. > > How about this..............there has never been a flowering of > understanding, > intellectual or otherwise. > > There has never been an investigation, whether one's own or done for > another.. > > ...ever.
