agreed, in the ultimate sense this lifetime is but a flash of light but in that flash is life, expression, beauty, drama.......
and a chance to experience one's own vibrating, nectarous, love-light On Aug 27, 10:31 pm, Kuber Technologies <[email protected]> wrote: > Since the Beedi dude is supposed to be the expert in such > matters...........Godzen...... > > here is what he kept on growling at poor seekers appearing in front of him > > "I do not negate the world. I see it as appearing in consciousness, which is > the totality of the known in the immensity of the unknown. > > What begins and ends is mere appearance. > > The world can be said to appear, but not to "be". > > The appearance may last very long on some scale of time, and be very short > on another, but ultimately it comes to the same. > > Whatever is time bound is momentary and has no reality." > > ---------- > > And that world which can be said to appear but not to be ......... > > ...is a collation of experiences.........both the mundane and the > profound..... > > .....experiences which include a satsangh with the energy-exuding-Master. > > Or a satsangh with the energy-sapping divine mistress in a bordello. > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Kuber Technologies < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:04 AM, godszen <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> so the universe, all creation, and your life is a concept? > > >> and to be dismissed as such? > > > A dismissal needs a substantivity of the to-be-dismissed. > > > Awake today morning, sipping from a hot cup of tea........do you dismiss > > the drama of last night sleep dream? > > > Or there is a prevailing knowing (to use a word) of the intrinsic nature of > > appearing gestalts, > > > .............whether that be the awake-dream drama or the sleep-dream > > drama, or the deep-sleep-state. > > > A prevailing knowing , which does not dawn because it is never not so ..... > > > ......and in the absence of the dawning, there is no dusking. > > > No alpha, no omega. > > > Which off course makes the term "prevailing" superfluous. > > > A knowing, in which there is neither the presence of acceptance, or the > > presence of negation/dismissing..... > > > ..... and neither their absences. > > > A knowing which apperceives that appearing gestalts are not apart, not > > separate.... > > > ............as there is no independent, separative loci at which the > > appearing gestalt > > > can get anchored...... > > > .....and simultaneously apperceives the durational conceptuality of > > appearances. > > > Thus the immanence and the simultaneous transcendence of the immanence. > > > Call it Turiyatta or awareness-not-aware-of-itself.........or > > Bozo.........makes no difference.
