*As beautiful and simple as the quote of Nisargadatta was, I found the part written by you was extremely annoying and utterly disgusting.
Please stop writing your own thoughts. They are very ugly. Your sense of humour is like a horrible car crash. * On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Kuber Technologies < [email protected]> wrote: > > Since the Beedi dude is supposed to be the expert in such > matters...........Godzen...... > > here is what he kept on growling at poor seekers appearing in front of him > > > > "I do not negate the world. I see it as appearing in consciousness, which > is the totality of the known in the immensity of the unknown. > > What begins and ends is mere appearance. > > The world can be said to appear, but not to "be". > > The appearance may last very long on some scale of time, and be very short > on another, but ultimately it comes to the same. > > Whatever is time bound is momentary and has no reality." > > ---------- > > > > And that world which can be said to appear but not to be ......... > > ...is a collation of experiences.........both the mundane and the > profound..... > > .....experiences which include a satsangh with the energy-exuding-Master. > > Or a satsangh with the energy-sapping divine mistress in a bordello. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Kuber Technologies < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:04 AM, godszen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> so the universe, all creation, and your life is a concept? >>> >>> and to be dismissed as such? >>> >> >> >> A dismissal needs a substantivity of the to-be-dismissed. >> >> Awake today morning, sipping from a hot cup of tea........do you dismiss >> the drama of last night sleep dream? >> >> >> >> >> Or there is a prevailing knowing (to use a word) of the intrinsic nature >> of appearing gestalts, >> >> .............whether that be the awake-dream drama or the sleep-dream >> drama, or the deep-sleep-state. >> >> >> >> A prevailing knowing , which does not dawn because it is never not so >> ..... >> >> ......and in the absence of the dawning, there is no dusking. >> >> No alpha, no omega. >> >> Which off course makes the term "prevailing" superfluous. >> >> >> >> >> A knowing, in which there is neither the presence of acceptance, or the >> presence of negation/dismissing..... >> >> ..... and neither their absences. >> >> >> >> A knowing which apperceives that appearing gestalts are not apart, not >> separate.... >> >> >> ............as there is no independent, separative loci at which the >> appearing gestalt >> >> can get anchored...... >> >> >> >> .....and simultaneously apperceives the durational conceptuality of >> appearances. >> >> >> >> Thus the immanence and the simultaneous transcendence of the immanence. >> >> >> Call it Turiyatta or awareness-not-aware-of-itself.........or >> Bozo.........makes no difference. >> >> >> >> >
