Consciousness 'is' saying that. Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone -----Original Message----- From: fearlessinquirer <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 08:15:44 To: Advaita-Zen<[email protected]> Subject: Re: Being aware of your self
who is saying "No, that is consciousness."? it appears a perceiver is percieving consciouness also. On Sep 4, 11:09 am, [email protected] wrote: > No, that is consciousness. > Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: fearlessinquirer <[email protected]> > > Sender: [email protected] > Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 07:59:37 > To: Advaita-Zen<[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Being aware of your self > > who is speaking/writing? isn't that the perceiver? > > On Sep 4, 10:50 am, [email protected] wrote: > > I know nothing about the perceiver because I've never perceived it. > > Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: fearlessinquirer <[email protected]> > > > Sender: [email protected] > > Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 07:46:19 > > To: Advaita-Zen<[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: Being aware of your self > > > If it doesn't exist then who is the perceiver. Does the perciever have > > a birth certificate? Does the perciever come and go? Is the perceiver > > always there or not there at all? > > > On Sep 4, 6:12 am, [email protected] wrote: > > > You can't. What you can be aware of is not your self. You can be aware of > > > beingness aka of your I am sense, so that sense is not your real self. > > > Your real self is impossible to perceive, so don't loose time trying to > > > do so. > > > Of course what I am referring here when I say 'your real self' is just an > > > idea because I can't really refer to that which doesn't exist. I say it > > > doesn't exist because I define something to exist with something which is > > > perceivable. > > > Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
