Mouth is knowledge hence known. "Only when the mind stops does Consciousness behold Itself."
On Sep 4, 1:37 pm, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > But you are beyond what you see. > How can you see yourself ? > There comes a point where you can feel yourself. > But it will be emptiness. Because it is the Self. > The one beyond everything is you. > For example : Lets say you are the mouth. You can taste all the food coming > in. All the sweet, spice, saltiness and bitterness. > But when there is nothing in the mouth, can the mouth taste itself ? > So is pure awareness. > You are unknowable. But only you are the reality. What passes through the > mouth is not reality. The mouth always remains. > > On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 6:27 PM, fearlessinquirer <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > The observer is the observed > > the thinker is the thought > > the doer is the doing > > > On Sep 4, 1:22 pm, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The perceiver cannot be perceived. Anything that is perceived is not the > > > perceiver. > > > > On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 4:23 PM, fearlessinquirer <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > "Only when the mind stops does Consciousness behold Itself." > > > > > On Sep 4, 11:21 am, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > Consciousness 'is' saying that. > > > > > Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: fearlessinquirer <[email protected]> > > > > > > Sender: [email protected] > > > > > Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 08:15:44 > > > > > To: Advaita-Zen<[email protected]> > > > > > Subject: Re: Being aware of your self > > > > > > who is saying "No, that is consciousness."? it appears a perceiver is > > > > > percieving consciouness also. > > > > > > On Sep 4, 11:09 am, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > No, that is consciousness. > > > > > > Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: fearlessinquirer <[email protected]> > > > > > > > Sender: [email protected] > > > > > > Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 07:59:37 > > > > > > To: Advaita-Zen<[email protected]> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Being aware of your self > > > > > > > who is speaking/writing? isn't that the perceiver? > > > > > > > On Sep 4, 10:50 am, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > > I know nothing about the perceiver because I've never perceived > > it. > > > > > > > Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: fearlessinquirer <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > Sender: [email protected] > > > > > > > Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 07:46:19 > > > > > > > To: Advaita-Zen<[email protected]> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Being aware of your self > > > > > > > > If it doesn't exist then who is the perceiver. Does the perciever > > > > have > > > > > > > a birth certificate? Does the perciever come and go? Is the > > > > perceiver > > > > > > > always there or not there at all? > > > > > > > > On Sep 4, 6:12 am, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > > > You can't. What you can be aware of is not your self. You can > > be > > > > aware of beingness aka of your I am sense, so that sense is not your > > real > > > > self. Your real self is impossible to perceive, so don't loose time > > trying > > > > to do so. > > > > > > > > Of course what I am referring here when I say 'your real self' > > is > > > > just an idea because I can't really refer to that which doesn't exist. > > I say > > > > it doesn't exist because I define something to exist with something > > which is > > > > perceivable. > > > > > > > > Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
