On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:05 AM, godszen <[email protected]> wrote: > to the best of my understanding, that is > precisely the evolution of the soul, > from completely unconscious, to > gradually more and more conscious, > then one day, fully conscious, > completely awake >
Godzen, the time in which such an evolution is to occur.... ..... for any evolution to start, flow and reach whatever it's self created goal....... .....that frame of time(or spatial loci) does not exist. For example, the time in which this particular arrangement of pixels on a PC screen got put together and then got transmitted through cables, router, satellites...... .....such that the specific arrangement appears on another PC screen and are getting read right now as a pair of eyes move over .....word to word...... that frame of time(or spatial loci)......does not exist. Just seems like. As-if. In this.......... absence-of time-in which-to-occur-process..... ........ the prescription of an object labeled as satguru needed to take you to the 7th level of the process, label that state whatever..... .....is one more nuance of amusing absurdity. One more nuance of the As-if-ness. Sure, within the domain of thought.......such premises would be constructed by thought, thought which then proceeds to create the experiences..... ..... and objects which appear to dole out the Shakti zaps and the objects which receive the zaps and then go la la with such durational experiences.... ..... all of which appearing to validate the self-created premise. But that's all that there is. Confabulations of thought. > Buddha said; I am merely awake > The word "merely" was not prattled. :-) It is not that the object that popularly swung to the label Buddha was awake. It is that through such an object, the prattling arose that the quality of " I AM", the nature of the sense of impersonal presence....... is awakeness. Which is as much subject to the As-If-ness ............intrinsic to any prattling. Including this.
