Nisargadatta's ultimate message is not to reside in the "I am" but to ultimately forget everything in the end and reside in the absolute.
By taking you to the "I am" he gets you to reach it, stabilise it without words and ultimately see it as illusory. Then it can be seen you are the absolute. That which is real cannot be put into words. The stand you take on the experience and the terminology you use is why we are debating this. Ideally we agree, yet we turn discussion into argument and eventually call names, fight, start wars. So much for ideals ;)
