.
A very Old metaphor …......... but so true today. Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden. They had free-will but they decided to partake in the fruit from the tree of knowledge. It is this knowledge that shows us how all we see and do is bound by a supreme inevitability. How our condition and circumstance always dictate he following condition and circumstance. Without Knowledge we lived in peace and harmony with what is. No questions, labels or measurements. No duality. We have to complete the circle. Surrender and Master knowledge. See clearly. Dance with the mystery. To return to Eden …........... . On Apr 18, 6:50 pm, Sandeep-Kuber Technologies <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/18/2011 7:50 PM, Mark Ty-Wharton wrote: > > > Okay here is one... > > > Right now, I am making a decision not to share a decision or action of > > significance and enable such a decision t withhold experience out of > > my independent volition. > > > Decipher away! > > Without the previous reply, would that decision not to share ever occur, > as a reaction? > > Visit to this forum are rare .....this visit was due to a time slot > which became available. > > That time slot became available due to 4 different events that happened > about which you Mark have no clue or have any connection whatsoever. > > Incidentally one of these events occurred in Israel. > > Even in the rare visits, invariably mails under the sender named Mark > Ty-Wharton get automatically deleted. > > This time it did not. > > As the deciphering gets deeper and deeper, the web emerges more and more.... > > .....and it is not too difficult to see that each strand of the web had > to happen exactly in the manner it did, > > .....at the time it did... > > ..for a decision to arise through an object named Mark Ty-Wharton, not > to share, at the time it did. > > A different web, a different set of neuro-transmitter chemical profile > precisely in the moment, in the object named Mark, > > a different thought process would have occurred, producing a different > decision. > > Comprende? > > Take any action, any decision and work backwards as to what happened > just previous to the event being deciphered. > > And then go back. > > And back > > And back > > And see that there is not a single event, mental, emotional or physical > which has an iota of an independent volition about it. > > The very characteristics, physical, mental, emotional which makes the > object Mark what it is... > > ...is the physical actualization of one specific sperm getting attached > with one specific ovum. > > Another set and the object Mark Ty-Whartoncould have been an hermaphrodite. > > Or a decision to abort and this conversation would have never started, > forget the decision not to share. > > Another environ in which nurturance took place, and Mark Ty-Whartoncould > be speaking Tulu and wearing the hula as a formal dinner dress. > > There was no independent volition involved in the birth of the object > popularly known as Mark Ty-Wharton, there will none in the death of the > same object. > > The mundane events in between, have none either. > > > > - Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
