We are not discussing free will any more let's start again tomorrow Did you see what happened there ;)
Sent from an iPhone On 18 Apr 2011, at 22:17, Marcus <[email protected]> wrote: > . > > > A very Old metaphor …......... but so true today. > > Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden. They had free-will but they > decided to partake in the fruit from the tree of knowledge. It is > this knowledge that shows us how all we see and do is bound by a > supreme inevitability. How our condition and circumstance always > dictate he following condition and circumstance. Without Knowledge > we lived in peace and harmony with what is. No questions, labels or > measurements. No duality. > > We have to complete the circle. Surrender and Master knowledge. See > clearly. Dance with the mystery. > > To return to Eden …........... > > > . > > On Apr 18, 6:50 pm, Sandeep-Kuber Technologies > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 4/18/2011 7:50 PM, Mark Ty-Wharton wrote: >> >>> Okay here is one... >> >>> Right now, I am making a decision not to share a decision or action of >>> significance and enable such a decision t withhold experience out of >>> my independent volition. >> >>> Decipher away! >> >> Without the previous reply, would that decision not to share ever occur, >> as a reaction? >> >> Visit to this forum are rare .....this visit was due to a time slot >> which became available. >> >> That time slot became available due to 4 different events that happened >> about which you Mark have no clue or have any connection whatsoever. >> >> Incidentally one of these events occurred in Israel. >> >> Even in the rare visits, invariably mails under the sender named Mark >> Ty-Wharton get automatically deleted. >> >> This time it did not. >> >> As the deciphering gets deeper and deeper, the web emerges more and more.... >> >> .....and it is not too difficult to see that each strand of the web had >> to happen exactly in the manner it did, >> >> .....at the time it did... >> >> ..for a decision to arise through an object named Mark Ty-Wharton, not >> to share, at the time it did. >> >> A different web, a different set of neuro-transmitter chemical profile >> precisely in the moment, in the object named Mark, >> >> a different thought process would have occurred, producing a different >> decision. >> >> Comprende? >> >> Take any action, any decision and work backwards as to what happened >> just previous to the event being deciphered. >> >> And then go back. >> >> And back >> >> And back >> >> And see that there is not a single event, mental, emotional or physical >> which has an iota of an independent volition about it. >> >> The very characteristics, physical, mental, emotional which makes the >> object Mark what it is... >> >> ...is the physical actualization of one specific sperm getting attached >> with one specific ovum. >> >> Another set and the object Mark Ty-Whartoncould have been an hermaphrodite. >> >> Or a decision to abort and this conversation would have never started, >> forget the decision not to share. >> >> Another environ in which nurturance took place, and Mark Ty-Whartoncould >> be speaking Tulu and wearing the hula as a formal dinner dress. >> >> There was no independent volition involved in the birth of the object >> popularly known as Mark Ty-Wharton, there will none in the death of the >> same object. >> >> The mundane events in between, have none either. >> >> >> >> - Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text -
