> -----Original Message----- > From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frans Bouma > Sent: Montag, 26. Juli 2004 17:15 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Common Sort Order for .NET and > SQL Server > > > So what? > > > > The original poster actually misrepresented his case totally. > > Not my fault, really, you know. > > HE had the guts to stand up and excuse himself for this. > > Everyone else acctually, despite this, seems to think that I do > > something wrong? > > > > Do you guys eat arrogance for breakfast or what? > > haha :D > > > In the OP's answer to my post he actually made an > explanation of his > > problem that was totally different than his original post. > > True, however you also made an interpretation error on your > side: you assumed the TS was thinking a select * from table > gives data in a particular order. Without knowing that (it > wasn't mentioned in the posting), you somewhat accused him of > being that stupid, which is of course not that nice :)
Well, you made the same mistake, so it was not my interpretation which was in error, but his presentation. Thomas > > FB > > =================================== > This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com > Some .NET courses you may be interested in: > > NEW! Guerrilla ASP.NET, 17 May 2004, in Los Angeles > http://www.develop.com/courses/gaspdotnetls > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > http://discuss.develop.com > =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentorŪ http://www.develop.com Some .NET courses you may be interested in: NEW! Guerrilla ASP.NET, 17 May 2004, in Los Angeles http://www.develop.com/courses/gaspdotnetls View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
