Frank Wiles wrote:
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 23:46:12 -0500
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure, but I still want to hear first, what do you have on your mind,
that you want to propose to users?
A quick howto on the website for how to configure ServerToken so
that it will be detected by NetCraft.
+1
While I think the NetCraft survey is important, maybe we should
attack this another way. Create our own "registered users" page,
like the Linux Counter site, where mod_perl users could list their
sites. This still wouldn't catch everyone, but every little bit
helps.
Personally, I doubt we really want to do that. But if others are
interested, by all means go for it. I just think noone will really
care, and we will have the efforts wasted, which otherwise could be
directed at better venues. But what do I know :) Please don't consider
that as a discouraging note :)
Yeah I was just throwing that out there as an idea. I think if we
mention ServerToken, and it's role in mod_perl user counting, in
the installation instructions it might help to reduce the erosion
of the numbers.
Sure, sounds good.
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
