On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 11:06:09AM -0500, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote: > Tim Bunce [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth: > *> > *>I'm sure there are many businesses using perl who have itches to scratch > *>and one efficient way for them to scratch is to fund relevant developers > *>who can fix the itch in a way that moves perl forward for everyone. > > Sure, that's a form of philanthropy which is a useful form of advocacy. :) > Philanthropy without strings is even better :) > > What happens when someone or some company offers a compelling amount of > money for something that isn't as globally beneficial. What if they turn a > bit sour and do more harm than good? > > Philanthropy can be a complicated business. Sure. Ultimately that's a decision for the people involved. Tim.
- Corrupting the Perl community (was perl vs php.) Selena Sol
- Re: Corrupting the Perl community (was perl vs ph... Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Corrupting the Perl community (was perl vs ph... Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Corrupting the Perl community (was perl vs ph... Tim Bunce
- Re: Corrupting the Perl community (was perl vs ph... Tim Bunce
- Re: Corrupting the Perl community (was perl v... Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Corrupting the Perl community (was perl vs ph... Jeremy Zawodny
- Re: Corrupting the Perl community (was perl vs ph... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- RE: Corrupting the Perl community (was perl vs ph... Selena Sol
- Re: Corrupting the Perl community (was perl vs ph... Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- RE: Corrupting the Perl community (was perl vs ph... Selena Sol
- Re: Corrupting the Perl community (was perl vs ph... Chris Nandor
- Re: Corrupting the Perl community (was perl v... Peter Scott
- Re: Corrupting the Perl community (was perl vs ph... John Adams
