[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steven Lembark) writes: > > Just saying 'tuning' doesn't necessarily mean that those who tune, know > > how to do that. For those who don't know, 10M process means at most 10 > > processes per 100M or RAM, which is wrong in most cases if you don't know > > how. The mod_perl guide tries to cover most of the known techniques to > > improve the memory usage and therefore performance: > > http://perl.apache.org/guide/ > > Face it, how many SA's have you ever met that can carry a tune? > > One problem is that the request object is expensive to construct, > which slows down the call to handlers. That sounds like utter nonsense to me. In any real application, of the bottlenecks you get that actually mean something, that will certainly not be one. - ask -- ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do();
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Jason W. May
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Dan Brian
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Abigail
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Nicholas Clark
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Hasanuddin Tamir
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Hasanuddin Tamir
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Abigail
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Hasanuddin Tamir
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Stas Bekman
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Ask Bjoern Hansen
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Jason W. May
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Nathan Torkington
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Tim Bunce
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Hasanuddin Tamir
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Ask Bjoern Hansen
- RE: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Jason W. May
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Kurt D. Starsinic
- Re: perl vs php. just the facts, ma'am. Hasanuddin Tamir
