Adam Turoff [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth: *>> *>> Doesn't this indicate that we should be in the business of offering *>> not-for-profit Perl certification (without offering training), both *>> as a good in and of itself and also to establish a Good Example for *>> others? *> *>Do you propose that we create a certification agency that would *>disallow someone from programming in Perl? What egregious lapse *>would cause that to happen -- and what would/should we classify as *>egregious? None of the IT certifications I've seen have provisions *>for that, save the limited lifespan of certification credentials. Non-profit and not-for-profit are two different things. I think he meant something along the lines of lpi.org which is an independent, non-corporate certification body who also seems to have softened up Usenix/SAGE to the point of Usenix likely considering certification...an exam sure to include Perl. e.
- Re: Perl certification (was: Advertising Perl) John Adams
- Re: Perl certification (was: Advertising Perl) Johnathan Kupferer
- Re: Perl certification (was: Advertising Perl) Adam Turoff
- Re: Re: Perl certification (was: Advertising Perl) jadams01
- Re: Perl certification (was: Advertising Perl) Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Re: Perl certification (was: Advertising Perl) Adam Turoff
- RE: Re: Perl certification (was: Advertising Perl) Sidharth Malhotra
- Re: Perl certification (was: Advertising Perl) Chris Nandor
- Re: Re: Perl certification (was: Advertising Perl) Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Re: Perl certification (was: Advertising Perl) jadams01
- Re: Perl certification (was: Advertising Perl) Adam Turoff
- Re: Perl certification (was: Advertising Perl) Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Perl certification (was: Advertising Perl) John Porter
- Re: Re: Re: Perl certification (was: Advertising Perl) jadams01
- RE: Re: Perl certification (was: Advertising Perl) blowther
- Re: Perl certification (was: Advertising Perl) Kurt D. Starsinic
- Re: Perl certification (was: Advertising Perl) John Porter
