On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 02:57:42AM +0000, Dan Brian wrote:
> 
> 2. Extensibility is one area where Perl has nothing to prove. It may be
> true that not everyone is an XS fan, but XS is not as difficult as some
> portray it. Nor is it the only way to extend (extend in the C sense, not
> the language sense Nat pointed out), given SWIG and Inline.

Yeah, but you still need to use a different language (XS, C, or most
likely both) to extend Perl. I don't know Tcl, but it's my understanding
you can extend Tcl using Tcl. If that's true indeed, I'd say Tcl wins
with big points here. (Or, more generally, any language that can be
extended without dropping into another language wins over Perl in this
department).



Abigail

Reply via email to