In a message dated 5/7/08 7:28:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On May 7, 2008, at 7:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Is it possible that art is a way of archiving?
>
> Oh, you watched the DaVinci Code, too.
>
>
Did not. Didn't read it either. Too big, no pictures, and they all said it
was literature, and I don't do literature. I just meant perhaps art was a way
of saving things so they didn't get destroyed. It would explain why some
primitive art gets saved by people not part of the culture, and why you
can't
predict whether something is going to produce an aesthetic experience in
someone-no archive.
Kate Sullivan
**************
Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new
twists on family favorites at AOL Food.
(http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001)
