Over time, I've been elbow-nudged both online here and offline for "hiding" 
behind my nom-de-forum, 'Cheerskep'.   Other listers have been forthright in 
revealing their "civilian" names, and have even pointed us to their website, 
not 
just as a little self-advertising but as a kind of credential corroborating 
their qualification to speak about questions in aesthetics.

My feeling was I wanted to keep the two personas separate for this reason: 
They both involve writing, but two very different sorts. What I formerly did as 
a book publisher who judged and wrote about creative writing, and currently do 
as a playwright would, I felt, be accepted as no kind of corroborating 
credential by professional philosophers of art.

I eventually found out we have few such philosophers on the forum. The great 
majority of our active members are visual artists. 

I then realized my "creations" were unlikely to be very persuasive to the 
visual artists either. I'm not, with that line, confessing I feel what I write 
is 
no good.   Instead, what's on my mind is this: For the layman, and that's 
what all of you are in this context, reading plays is hard. The reason is that 
playwrights don't write plays -- they write scripts. The play is what the 
company puts on the stage, which is always far more than the writer puts on a 
page. 
Bridging the gap between script and play is the imagination of gifted 
professionals -- 
directors, actors, and others. 

I myself am not an optimal reader of numerous screenplays, because I lack the 
"visualizing" gift required to appreciate the script of a highly "visual" 
film. My wife, formerly an interior designer, had it, and my son and daughter, 
both now movie directors in Hollywood, have it. I've observed their visual 
imagination up close, so it's not delusion or false modesty when I say I know 
there's a talent needed to "get" a screenplay, and I don't have it. This isn't 
to 
bawl that I am talentLESS, it's just that I don't have THAT one. Thus it's no 
great put-down of either you or me when I claim that many of you, if you ever 
tried to read a playscript of mine, would likely shrug and say, "Eh? Feh."     

For all that, Brady, Conger, Baeza, Sullivan, Shoshensky and others of you 
have shown a courage and openness that shame me into now coming out of my 
peculiar closet.    

If you care to, maybe first go to: Wikipedia Thomas McCormack.

If that doesn't exhaust your interest, you might go on to: 
http://tommccormackplays.com

If nothing else, the Wikipedia entry will display the credential that has 
allowed me to adopt on our forum the pompous posture of an elder: my venerable 
age. 

-- Tom


**************
It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your 
travel deal here.
      
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)

Reply via email to