William writes:

"The use of the word ambiguity in art, esp. poetry, is to call attention to 
THE MULTIPLE INTERPRETATIONS EVOKED by an image or allusion, phrase, or word.   
It does not specify vagueness.   While the word ambiguity can be properly 
used to denote vagueness, in poetry it simply means many, as with layers.   THE 
ARGUMENTS BELOW MISS THAT POINT. (Stresses are mine. -- Cheerskep)
WC"

I can't ask readers to read again something I've written -- unless they are 
commenting on it. So I do ask William to read again my last message because it 
says exactly the opposite of what he seems to think it does. I wrote:

"Certainly if anyone thinks any work of art, or any
> utterance at all, is
> "perfectly clear" he is failing to recognize
> ambiguity in this sense: He
> doesn't
> realize NO TWO VIEWERS CONTEMPLATING THE SAME WORK WILL BE ENTERTAINING THE 
EXACT SAME NOTION."

William does not describe what he has in mind with 'vague'.
What most people have in mind is perhaps conveyed by such words as these: 
Indistinct, imprecise, dark, lacking clear outline or borders. These notions 
were 
not what I had in mind in my last posting, and that's why I did not use 
'vague' at all in that posting. 

I explicitly conveyed that there are times in my work when I wanted viewers 
to entertain different possible interpretations of what they've just seen or 
heard.     

Perhaps I confused William with my assertion that both clarity and ambiguity 
are a matter of degree. All lines are to a degree ambiguous. The writer can 
never fully prevent lines from occasioning interpretations alien to his 
intentions, but with effort he can cut down on their likely number. I should 
have made 
clearer that what I also had in mind was the relative frequency of ambiguous 
lines compared to those when I want viewers to have no doubt about a "fact" in 
the storyline. Some playwrights, like Pinter, have a much higher percent of 
intentionally ambiguous lines than I ever do.   

William continues to dismay by how infrequently his general disgruntlement 
allows him to cite something he agrees with. Psychotherapists talk about a 
patient-type they term a "grievance collector", and they try to point out to 
those 
patients the various ways that conduct hurts them in the end. 
     



**************
It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel 
deal here.
      
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)

Reply via email to