For a learned studious discussion of pure Peirce then the Peirce
List is probably the best online forum to join. For an
application of pure Peirce to fields like aesthetics and art and
ethics then the Peirce List and the Dewey List and the Aesthetics
List come to mind as good places to be. Perhaps members here
could suggest some other website forums where Peirce could be
applied in discussion. The goals for me as a student of Peirce
are to improve my mind, and to more fully appreciate the bad and
good about his ideas and their use. In regard to his wordy terms
and baroque systems it does seem that Peirce did not pander to
lazy thinkers with easy ways. In any event and in my opinion most
statements on his contribution are usually understated and on his
difficulty are vastly overstated. The final plea might be to ask
others for an alternate to Peirce in regard to philosophy. 
-FCK 

Geoff wrote... 
Assume that the members of the list serve constitute a community
(individuals with a level of shared interest/concern) and assume
further that because there is a range of fluency with Piercean
terminology among members of the list, a degree of confusion
exists and assume further approximately equivalent motivation
among members to adapt their existing vocabularies to either more
Piercean or less Piercean terminology on what basis, if any, do
individuals in the community alter their vocabularies?

William wrote... 
Peircian terminology is well-known to be all but opaque -- which
helps to account for his dwindled influence.  Aside from the
necessity for technical language in the fully specialized strata
of any field, good philosophy can be clear and useful to most
reasonably well-educated people. In my summarized view, Peirce
was entangled in his own desire to be very rational and still
accomodate his religious conviction and that led to more and more
abstract syntax and terminology.  Nevertheless, some people,
already tongue-tied by some contemporary philosophers, are
rediscovering Peirce and want to restore his influence.  Perhaps
that is a good thing. 

Reply via email to