Correct.
WC

--- On Thu, 10/2/08, GEOFF CREALOCK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: GEOFF CREALOCK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Marks on Canvas
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Thursday, October 2, 2008, 9:05 AM
> My interpretation is that Hoffman's comment was a
> (horrors) metaphor; that 
> he was referring to the contemplation which occurs before
> paint is ever put 
> on canvas. The "first four marks" aren't
> actually visible but are extremely 
> important. The act of doing the painting is late in the
> process.
> Geoff C
> 
> 
> >From: "Chris Miller"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [email protected]
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: Marks on Canvas
> >Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:08:36 GMT
> >
> >First - I was thinking about the Jackson Pollack movie
> -- that showed him
> >getting ready for his first big-time show. He rolled a
> bolt of canvas out 
> >onto
> >the floor -- painted it -- and then cut it up to make
> enough paintings for 
> >the
> >exhibit. So yes -- eventually he was considering the
> edges of each painting 
> >--
> >but only at the end, rather than at the beginning of
> the process.
> >
> >Then -- I was thinking about the watercolour painters
> -- who often don't 
> >paint
> >to the edge of their paper -- so the precise edge is
> not determined until 
> >the
> >piece is framed - and sometimes it's framed by
> someone other than the 
> >artist.
> >
> >Finally -- I've  seen a lot of paintings that just
> seemed to have been 
> >begun
> >somewhere in the middle --with the image of a body, or
> head, or flower -- 
> >and
> >then eventually been worked out to the periphera.
> >
> >I've also cropped a lot of paintings -- not the
> actual ones -- but jpg 
> >images
> >of them -- and haven't noticed that the precise
> location of the outer edge
> >makes all that much difference.
> >
> >So yes -- I'm doubting whether Hoffman's dictum
> is relevant to any kind of
> >painting other than his own.
> >
> >Same thing with his other famous dictum:  "The
> pictorial life as a 
> >pictorial
> >reality results from the aggregate of two-and
> three-dimensional tensions: a
> >combination of the effect of simultaneous expansion and
> contraction with 
> >that
> >of push and pull."  (i.e. -- I would say that the
> pictorial reality of
> >paintings from other schools results from much more)
> >
> >                                ***********
> >
> > >Miller, you don't know much about painting or
> its history.  All through
> >western art and other art, too, the artist has always
> paid attention to the
> >composition, and the composition ends at the edges of
> the canvas, so those
> >edges are crucial.  Hofmann was simply reinforcing that
> obvious concern.
> >Artists who ignored their compositions were either dumb
> and happily 
> >forgotten
> >or they were dumb and became stars in the midst of
> decandnce.  But the 
> >viewer
> >usually knows how the composition functions within the
> framing edges of the
> >canvas,
> >if they know anything at all about looking at paintings
> ...and not many do.
> >
> >
> >____________________________________________________________
> >Click to become a designer and quit your boring job.
> >http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/Ioyw6ijlSIOWLW66LSuV4bWDP3Upen
> >NlPk61ezdLb4rYVbCjs2Q1Wc/

Reply via email to