In a message dated 10/3/2008 9:17:20 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
WC:
I don't think we are in disagreement except in my questioning the use of  the 
term hardwired.  It is not a term applicable to the organic nature of  the 
human brain.  This term is newly applied to humans, since the advent of  the 
computer age.  Other metaphors to liken the neural structures of the  human 
brain 
are more accurate, even something as odball as shower-head or  fountain 
plumbing.

 
LF: Ok, I will accept another more accurate descriptive term, but  
'hardwired' is generally well understood and accepted.

I appreciate your reference to the human ability to see faces in nearly  any 
pattern.  The human brain has an unusually large area devoted to facial  
recognition enabling us to recall a huge number of different faces and to 
"read"  
extremely subtle facial expressions.  Our sense of smell, on the other  hand, 
is relatively poor.  For dogs it is the opposite.  Their brains  have a large 
area devoted to smell and a small area devoted to sight.  Yes,  I agree that a 
human brain would not become, say, a dog brain.  Any  ordinary dog will 
outsmell any human every time.
 
LF: I agree totally.

Oh, yes, I also question the inductive logic of the statement that says  in 
effect that we are only capable of what we are capable of --which is not to  
say it is a false statement. As I said, it is a  truism.
WC



LF:   
"I believe that we must already have the built-in cognitive systems to do  or 
recognize anything that we now or in the future may do or recognize.  Innate 
abilities/traits exist cognitively (hardwired potencies) long  before we may 
become conscious, as a culture, of them."
 
William,
I had to say this to expand my position. The second sentence is most  
important as I give more emphasis to inherited cognitive traits than  to 
learning. 
Perceptual cropping is innate and existed long before any  codified notion of 
edgeness. It is with modern art that hyper sensitivity to  edgeness immerges in 
conjunction with the 'art object as the thing itself' and  the attempted 
obliteration of illusionary space. You and I are immersed in this  cultural 
emphasis so we are hyper-aware of it, and it becomes incorporated in  what we 
do. 
Again my main point to Frances is that perceptual cropping is  inherited first, 
even if it is later reinforced by cultural learning.
 
 
Luis Fontanills
Architect





**************New MapQuest Local shows what's happening at your destination.  
Dining, Movies, Events, News & more. Try it out!      
(http://local.mapquest.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000001)

Reply via email to