I have to admit -- that I found this list of ad hominems a real hoot -- and
broke out laughing time and time again.
William draws these short phrases with the same strength, buoyancy, and
tension as he draws those heavy black lines that snake across his large
canvases.
So now -- I suppose I should go back through the archives and find all the
choice words he's had to say about me. As I recall, he's recommended me for
psychiatric care many, many times - but I'm afraid that I do have some better
ways to spend my time.
Since so much (perhaps all) of aesthetics is based on personal authority --
it's no big surprise that this authority gets defended by personal insult --
it comes with the territory -- and I appreciate that at least William can
occasionally deliver his with some humor and style.
"those circus people who pound nails up their noses" -- what a hoot! -- how
did I ever miss that one the first time around ?
****************
Cheerskep drives home his point again.....like those circus people who pound
nails up their noses.
very narrow, literalist and mechanical
don't worry, I won't paraphrase you. I prefer good logic.
Cheerskep's obsession
annoying smug assumptions
Cheerskep claims to be the father philosopher
he lurks like a street mugger eager to pounce on any strolling IS that h
appens by.
Cheerskep, for all his own achievements, is far, far down the hill from
Kuspit
If he were to become dictator he's insist on solipsism as a constitutional
ammendment.
Cheerskep just can't stand being confronted by anyone who wants to dig
intob&
He is simply rigidly stuck to his idea and it's not sufficiently
demonstrated.
self serving
The more Cheerskep toots a one note horn
It does nothing for Cheerskep's argument to keep whap, whap, whapping the
dead horse
He's very testy about his assertive notions
Spurious
19C cane-whacking outbursts
Cheerskep does not allow a third party (like a jury) to reveal whether or not
everyone, usually excepting himself, is philosophically, logically,
linguistically muddled.
maybe it's just that his comments are too long and
seem to stray from any clear outlook.
Cheerskep, suddenly alert, happily wrings his hands.
The two of them [Cheerskep and Michael Brady] are like the motorcycle cops
hiding behind facing billboards and all too ready for those reckless kids
speeding by in red sportscars.
In Michael's case I suspect a Jesuit education
afflicts him; that's bad enough; in Cheerskep's I
think it's a lingering Harvard narcissism.
One never fully recovers from Jesuit or Harvard education.
I think you philosophers are lost in the wilderness.
sexist and banal.
Cheerskep's Bible sermon
_____________________________________________________________
Need cash? Click to get a cash advance.
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2211/fc/Ioyw6ijlfa8NTMheW0V26MtE1O3JKe
7988Oa1AbjuoqxVt7qMBRDV6/?count=1234567890
