Chris is right about my judgment of myself now.   As I said a couple of days
ago, I'm too old.

I'm too old for two reasons: I don't have the time and strength to build a
complete structure to house "a philosophy". Ability aside, imagine the
heavy-lifting done by the likes of Aristotle, Aquinas, and Kant!

And I no longer have the consistent mental acuity required. I frequently look
back on postings of mine that are only a few days old and see I said it
wrong, or I overlooked something my younger eyes would not have let pass.

I fancy that if I'd stayed in it way back then, I coulda been a contenda.
But that was a very bad time for philosophy, and it just didn't interest me.
In the U.S. and Europe, philosophy was suffocating in the coils of the logic
squids.   Only England was breathing somewhat healthily. Meantime, it was a
good time for "creative writing" -- so I went there.

Nevertheless I believe that every lister can still ask worthy questions, and
show flashes of startling insight -- the sorts of insight that professional
philosophers seldom have because, paradoxically, they are so handicapped by
the
blinkering received "wisdom" they feel they must take into account. I've often
seen listers make swift comments that I sensed were likely only from someone
unburdened by the wrong-headed standard academic curriculum.

Meantime I see Kate has beat me to saying: I'm not the monitor of the list. I
also take Kate's point about not straying into fields of philosophy not
relevant to aesthetics. I tell myself I'm right to fight, say, the reifying of
such
things as "art" and "beauty" because it commits errors in philosophy of mind
and metaphysics, but -- another common enfeeblement of age -- I can fail to
register when I've drifted too far from the accepted path. I'll renew my
efforts
to avoid useless ad hominem and drifting.



**************
Play online games for FREE at Games.com! All of your favorites,
no registration required and great graphics b check it out!
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1211202682x1200689022/aol?redir=
http://www.games.com?ncid=emlcntusgame00000001)

Reply via email to