In a message dated 10/26/08 10:01:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> And yet, here he is, the owner/monitor of our list. > He is the owner. He is not the monitor. There is no monitor on this list. It is assumed that we are all capable of arguing our positions,that we will feel free to speak as we want, and that we will not hold words spoken in the fervor of argument against one another. It is also assumed that we will"do the reading" and make some attempt to be familiar with the subjects discussed. It is further assumed that this list is for the discussion of various aspects of aesthetics and no other aspect of philosophy. > > So maybe we should all admit that we're not trying to have a "philosophic > discussion" -- or if we are -- we should allow that our kind of philosophic > discussion would not be acceptable within the current academic community of > philosophers. (they don't want to join us anyway -- and recently they curtly > booted us off their website) > Once again: Departing the former list was not a philosophical move against this list. It was an administrative move to streamline their operation. Kate Sullivan List Administrator > > ************** Play online games for FREE at Games.com! All of your favorites, no registration required and great graphics b check it out! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1211202682x1200689022/aol?redir= http://www.games.com?ncid=emlcntusgame00000001)
