It doesn't look like Cheerskep is interested in further defining the
generically different virtues for which he enjoys different books -- and,
actually, I'm a bit surprised that he didn't just allow that the virtue of
each book, so far as he's concerned,  is sui generis.

But going back to the question that began this thread, "What is it about the
kernel of a story that hooks you?" -- the kernel that hooks me as a reader
(and presumably as a writer if I ever made the attempt) is ambiguity -- not
just any kind of ambiguity as William seemed to allow -- but moral ambiguity -
which is why I  cannot tolerate melodrama.

For me, the book is successful as the situations seem real and the ambiguity
seems important.  (wasn't this the argument that Kirby was finding  in the
Poetics last year ?. So yes, mimesis is important to me, and maybe I'm an
Aristotelian after all!)

"Rich and mellifluous writing" is an enhancement - but at least for me in this
period of my life -- when all I'm reading is translations or books written in
the writer's second language - it certainly is neither necessary nor
sufficient.


_____________________________________________________________
Click for online loan, fast & no lender fee, approval today
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2211/fc/Ioyw6ijmOSa3g8r2wySOT5o68zq6P8
RBvmCGXtZ1D7g00k9LcDOoiI/?count=1234567890

Reply via email to