William: Our values re society seem much the same. Because science accepts that only the fittest (individuals and species) survive does not necessarily have implications for how we choose to prioritise our decisions about governments and society. Science may produce information or evidence. Persons have to decide the significance of the evidenceand its applicability. There seems to be agreement that a time when this kind of information is particularly not helpful is in the act of creating. Once creation is complete (or adequate) reflection can occur. If it's interesting to know information about the say, visual cortex, consider it. But it won't be helpful in the act of creating. And viewers will have their typical personal standards for deciding if they value the work and I doubt that their decisions re their valuing of a work will have much to do with their knowledge of neuroscience. Reflecting on the neurological events of their deciding could invoke reference to neuroscience. Both have their place and utility.
Geoff C
----- Original Message ----- From: "William Conger" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: Neurology and "Art"


I favor legislation that contributes to social well-being. If that involves government funding and patient-doctor support for talk therapy, drug therapy, or some other professionally validated remedy, I am for it.

My view is that all essential health care should be free, all education through undergraduate college or equivalent free, all people are entitled to basic support and protections. No exceptions. No capital punishment in bits and pieces for the underclass or unlucky or for criminals. I also believe that all health and support providers should be properly well compensated according to the standards of their professions and that some elitist services can still be bought separately.
WC

Your logic would suggest that the theory of evolution
should (or could)
guide legislation that goverments might pass regarding
social support
funding.

Reply via email to