Cheerskep: I think most people know that Shakspeare was only telling a darn
good story. (Or presenting a story in a darn good way.)
Mowat leads us to believe he's reporting. I've learned that his story comes
before objectivity. Gladwell's omission of relevant facts is one thing;
claiming observations which re, in fact, manufactured is not a social good
(according to me).
Geoff C
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: Malcolm Gladwell
In a message dated 12/29/08 7:19:34 PM, [email protected] writes:
Farley Mowat's twisting facts to create a good story will be
out-lawed when I become king.
I hope you mean to create a good alleged non-fiction story. Otherwise the
likes of Shakespeare is in damn bad trouble with you.
**************
One site keeps you connected to all your email: AOL Mail,
Gmail, and Yahoo Mail. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&
icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000025)
