Yes, William -- freedom of the press -- everybody gets to publish anything -- but the issue here is reputation.
I would think that the reputation of a publisher rises or falls on the quality of what gets published -- and the reasons attached to the relevant decisions. The book that St Martins dumped was the first -- and to date appears to be the only -- biography on a major historical figure that was written after his extensive diary was made public in 1992. So ... if it were factual, articulate, and not outrageously reasoned -- it might be considered an important book for those interested in 20th C. history -- regardless of its "tone" and "insinuations". ____________________________________________________________ Click here to find a massage therapy school near you. http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/PnY6rc0q9QrfGzPJdPzFI0etiP178X QKHNYF8JiTgZd1gn9QWaibC/
