Who examines the qualification of the examiners?
On Jan 12, 2009, at 8:59 PM, joseph berg wrote:
By examining their qualifications?
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Chris Miller
<[email protected]>wrote:
How such experts should be selected?
Historically -- at least in Chicago -- the jury for national
shows once
consisted of those artists whose work had been selected for
national shows
in
previous years. This of course, would tend to entrench older
styles rather
than introduce new ones -- and the artists were eventually
replaced by
museum
professionals.
Today, of course, it is galleries rather than artists who are
juried into
the
major national shows - so expertise concerns marketability - while
museum
exhibits are juried by professional curators who are qualified by
academic
and
institutional achievement. (ie., first they must have a degree,
then they
must
rise within the ranks of an institution)
But what do you think, Boris?
How do you think that competent people with discerning taste and
knowledge
can
best be identified ?
I meant a majority within experts, who are few.
(competent people with discerning taste and knowledge.)
Boris Shoshensky
____________________________________________________________
Click for free info on discount teaching degrees programs.
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/
PnY6rc2QhT4NIEEwpeYqEIJ3qQMAwU
zDMbvvAsCHWtKETtLMOYxHO/
