I assume that there is some variability among juries as a whole, as well as among jurors, although I gather there are some things which are predictable. Work creates the taste? Could that mean that the viewer was seeing something unexpected? Or do we always see what we expect to see?Bela C
----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: competent people with discerning taste and knowledge Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:01:14 EST In a message dated 1/13/09 4:56:58 PM, [email protected] writes: > In fact, the best situation is when the work creates the taste > and not the other way around. > > This sounds important to the ongoing discussion. KAte Sullivan ************** A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1215855013x1201028747/aol?redir=ht tp://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgI D=62%26bcd=DecemailfooterNO62) -- Be Yourself @ mail.com! Choose From 200+ Email Addresses Get a Free Account at www.mail.com
