Only if that realist  is a materialist , let us say akin to Manet or  Courbet
- who understood all things are a assemblages -  machines and that this is
their essence


On 4/11/09 11:52 PM, "armando baeza" <[email protected]> wrote:

Now your talking like a realist artist
mando
On Apr 11, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Saul Ostrow wrote:

> Why would a chair have an essence - its design and it manufacture
> may describe
> a chair's essence - but this would  not refect its function but
> perhaps the
> act of sitting
>
>
> On 4/11/09 11:35 PM, "armando baeza" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> When one describes a chair, one may say the essence of the chair is
> ( something to sit on).In an "art experssion" it can be a log, a rock,
> a stool, a human or any thing one can sit on. What is the essence of
> a bottle" a flower, a human. I t exist's because you recognize it.
> You express it's form, which differs from any one else. yours is
> unique.
> mando
> On Apr 11, 2009, at 8:03 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>
>> What is the essence, why it exists and how it is formed?
>> Boris Shoshensky
>>
>>
>
>

____________________________________________

Saul Ostrow | Visual Arts & Technologies Environment Chair, Sculpture

Voice: 216-421-7927 | [email protected] | www.cia.edu<http://www.cia.edu/>

The Cleveland Institute of Art | 11141 East Boulevard, Cleveland, OH 44106



____________________________________________

>
> Saul Ostrow | Visual Arts & Technologies Environment Chair, Sculpture
>
> Voice: 216-421-7927 | [email protected] | www.cia.edu<http://
> www.cia.edu/>
>
> The Cleveland Institute of Art | 11141 East Boulevard, Cleveland,
> OH 44106
>
>
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------
>
>> From: armando baeza <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: armando baeza <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: Heidegger:  truth and art
>> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:00:36 -0700
>>
>> The purpose of art is to express the essence to your pleasure and sit
>> back and enjoy.
>> mando
>> On Apr 11, 2009, at 7:26 AM, Michael Brady wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 11, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Saul Ostrow wrote:
>>>
>>>> ""The purpose of art is to impart the sensation of things as they
>>>> are
>>>> perceived and not as they are known. The technique of art is to
>>>> make objects
>>>> 'unfamiliar', to make forms difficult, to increase the difficulty
>>>> and length
>>>> of perception because the process of perception is an aesthetic
>>>> end in itself
>>>> and must be prolonged." (Shklovsky, "Art as Technique")"
>>>
>>> Aha, back to the Russian Formalists and our brief mention of them
>>> last August! Ta da!
>>>
>>>
>>> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
>>> Michael Brady
>>> [email protected]
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> Always be in contact with a new pager. Click now!
>> http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/fc/
>> BLSrjpYRtj8RPa92Zd73ZkE9X2i522
>> YEJmFRwOoQy5anA41cIJkv7YgWmw4/
>
>
>
> --



--

Reply via email to