kant tells us its objective knowledge common to all beings - and while the category might be objective but its content might understood ( which is different than known) subjectively -
____________________________________________ Saul Ostrow | Visual Arts & Technologies Environment Chair, Sculpture Voice: 216-421-7927 | [email protected] | http://www.cia.edu/ The Cleveland Institute of Art | 11141 East Boulevard, Cleveland, OH 44106 Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 5:24 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: Heidegger: truth and art Essence can,t be fuzzy (don't like the word). It can't be known by humans as absolute knowledge. The emotional reaction to the essence, which is the closest we can come to the Truth, is "a bit different in every mind". Boris Shoshensky -------- Original Message ---------- From: armando baeza <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: armando baeza <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Heidegger: truth and art Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:50:35 -0700 Not really, the essence if fuzzier that one may think. The art work is the objective truth ... it exist's. the essence is a bit different in every mind. mando On Apr 11, 2009, at 8:41 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Makes sense to me. We can't confuse this Truth with personal truth > Chris > mentioned. Personal truth is a process of delivering undistorted > simple facts, information of our every day existence. Unless it is > product of > artistic creation- then it stops to be personal truth. > Boris Shoshensky > > ---------- Original Message ---------- > From: Saul Ostrow <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Heidegger: truth and art > Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:14:57 -0400 > > For Kant it is the objective truths that are universally > applicable - for > Hegel it is universally applicable processes - for Heidigger it is > what we > can know about the origins of our world-picture/ reality once we > have > gotten > beyond the habits of language and thought - for MH essence are > those things > that constitute the origins of our being in the world - > consequently they are > ontologically arrived at truths > > > On 4/11/09 11:03 PM, "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > wrote: > > What is the essence, why it exists and how it is formed? > Boris Shoshensky > > > ____________________________________________ > > Saul Ostrow | Visual Arts & Technologies Environment Chair, Sculpture > > Voice: 216-421-7927 | [email protected] | www.cia.edu<http:// > www.cia.edu/> > > The Cleveland Institute of Art | 11141 East Boulevard, Cleveland, > OH 44106 > > > > ---------- Original Message ---------- > > From: armando baeza <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: armando baeza <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Heidegger: truth and art > Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:00:36 -0700 > > The purpose of art is to express the essence to your pleasure and sit > back and enjoy. > mando > On Apr 11, 2009, at 7:26 AM, Michael Brady wrote: > >> On Apr 11, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Saul Ostrow wrote: >> >>> ""The purpose of art is to impart the sensation of things as they >>> are >>> perceived and not as they are known. The technique of art is to >>> make objects >>> 'unfamiliar', to make forms difficult, to increase the difficulty >>> and length >>> of perception because the process of perception is an aesthetic >>> end in itself >>> and must be prolonged." (Shklovsky, "Art as Technique")" >> >> Aha, back to the Russian Formalists and our brief mention of them >> last August! Ta da! >> >> >> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | >> Michael Brady >> [email protected] > > ____________________________________________________________ > Always be in contact with a new pager. Click now! > http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/fc/ > BLSrjpYRtj8RPa92Zd73ZkE9X2i522 > YEJmFRwOoQy5anA41cIJkv7YgWmw4/ > > > > --
