If the thingness is in it's properties, and every chain is actually
different,
then the "thingness" would only apply to each "individual chair",not
all chairs.
But if the sittingness is the property of all chairs,then the
"thingness" of
"sittingness" would apply to many many things, not just chairs.
mando
On Apr 20, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Saul Ostrow wrote:
its the nature of the negative - its thingness is in its properties
____________________________________________
Saul Ostrow | Visual Arts & Technologies Environment Chair, Sculpture
Voice: 216-421-7927 | [email protected] | http://www.cia.edu/
The Cleveland Institute of Art | 11141 East Boulevard, Cleveland,
OH 44106
________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 2:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Heidegger and thingness
It's the negative as a thing which is important, I thought. Directly
connected in space and time. I know we've gone digital.
Kate Sullivan
**************
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours
in just 2 easy steps!
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1220572844x1201387506/aol?
redir=http
:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fs
c%3D668072%26hmpgID%3D62%26bcd%3DAprilfooter420NO62)
