Timelessness refers to all periods equally, no? The more gadgets we
include
in art, the more difficult art gets. That's why i stay with the nude
body.
And Congers stays with color and form and Boris stays with nature, I
think.
mando
On Apr 25, 2009, at 2:12 PM, Saul Ostrow wrote:
Or inversely it has come to be associated with some other periods
sense of
timelessness
On 4/25/09 2:19 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
In a message dated 4/25/09 1:46:57 PM, [email protected] writes:
Whether art, local or universal, only depicts the historically
personal,
without a sense of timelessness it's place will remain just
historical.
Presumably that means that some historically personal portraits which
continue to be accepted as art have some aspect of "timelessness".
Kate Sullivan
**************
Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web.
Try the new Email Toolbar now!
(http://toolbar.aol.com/mail/download.html?ncid=txtlnkusdown00000027)
--
____________________________________________
Saul Ostrow | Visual Arts & Technologies Environment Chair, Sculpture
Voice: 216-421-7927 | [email protected] | www.cia.edu<http://
www.cia.edu/>
The Cleveland Institute of Art | 11141 East Boulevard, Cleveland,
OH 44106
