"(2) The idea of architecture being mainly creative may be opposed to it being mainly inventive and innovative"
Is not creative, inventive and innovative the same thing? Boris Shoshensky ---------- Original Message ---------- From: "Frances Kelly" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Architecture and Philosophy Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:53:11 -0400 Frances to Boris with thanks... (1) The idea stated by you that an architect is a trained artist and that architecture is automatically artistic might be disputed by some experts in the architectural field, who would hold that an architect is a skilled designer and that architecture is mainly praxic. (2) The idea of architecture being mainly creative may be opposed to it being mainly inventive and innovative. (3) The term "global" as used by me may be deceptive. It was used in an attempt to hold that infinite generals and definite specials and indefinite universals can all be global, but only within their arena or sphere or domain or realm. ____________________________________________________________ You're never too old to date. Senior Dating. Click Here. http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/fc/BLSrjpYdjjBYRPiOG5WVvax1iw3Jrd hXZYnOZZ7wlZ8DRk47PTH8JRbbsaM/
