Frances to Luis... It seems reasonable, for a definitive theory of architecture as a global class, that architecture be the act of only normal healthy humans, and as either art or nonart; and it might be tentatively agreed that the token objects of typical architecture be made by humans as constructed products, if not only as constructed or fabricated buildings; and further that the products be utilized by humans for themselves or for other nonhuman users, if not only occupied or inhabited by humans. It also seems to me that the products to be architecture might be either ordinary or extraordinary, although to be art in the lofty sense of high fine art the architecture would presumably have to be extraordinary, which is original and unique and authentic and genuine and powerful.
You partly wrote... Human occupation is not essential for it to be architecture. ...You can without a doubt remove human habitation/shelter as a fundamental requirement of architecture. ...
