I think art depends more on metaphor then science. Boris Shoshensky To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Architecture and Philosophy: Review Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 07:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
I say nothing but utility distinguishes art from science wc ________________________________ From: Michael Brady <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 7:19:36 PM Subject: Re: Architecture and Philosophy: Review On May 27, 2009, at 8:01 PM, Frances Kelly wrote: > > If your excellent question is correctly understood by me, you > seem to be wondering about the term "object" as to what it is, > and what it may stand for, and in what capacity it may do so. No. I asked you what difference you discern between art and science. I mentioned "object" because you said that architect.Indeed, apparently you believe science embraces art ("is consummatory of art"). I'd like to know what differentiates art and science. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Michael Brady [email protected] ____________________________________________________________ Get your dream car or truck. Click here. http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/fc/BLSrjpYYjRVkOxk6HHgjUZBmfEpjFC vYQBbzIIdrJeTx4YbBtv5lnJYIcE4/
