If it is the case then viewer can project "masterpiece" to be contained in the
piece of junk. Artist projects subjectivity in the creation. Viewers
projection does not change the immanent value of artwork.
For me artwork does contain independent set of valuable 'information'
for human brain, which Clive Bell called 'Significant Form'. His description
of it was not broad enough to cover all art forms from the point of global
theory.
Boris Shoshensky

It is indeed the case,just as, apparently, you decide that something is a piece 
of junk.


i like the significant form concept myself but it's so convenient and easy.  
All you need to do is proclaim that the object has significant form and that is 
just as subjective as saying it's all a matter of empathy.  But of course, as 
Worringer points outs, our sense of significant form is really inherited from 
our canon based on the Greco-Roman past and thus is too limited.  The one thing 
we can say for sure is that inert objects do not possess aesthetic qualities.  
They may have qualities of form:  line shape and texture, etc., that we call 
aesthetic and thus mirror back to the objects but as objects they are just so 
much material and in themselves, meaningless. The immanent value of an artwork 
is also assigned to it.  
wc 

Reply via email to