I agree with Imago.  However, the work is not authentic outsider work, in my 
opinion, but does seem to exploit some of the traits common to outsider art, 
such as the ephemeral materials.  Leaving his work on the street for anyone to 
take is not so uncommon anymore.  It's one of the fairly well-worn methods by 
which artists try to attract attention.

For me, mosto f his stuff is ho-hum, not because of his methods, subject 
matter, or even his late cubisto-Bacon manner, but because the works seem to 
have no compelling energy.  They are too complacent despite the tricky designs. 
I mean where's the do-or-die-it's gotta-be-done mania?

I think there are better artists in the gallery he shows at.
wc



________________________________
From: imago Asthetik <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 7:52:54 PM
Subject: Re: Rand Chapter One: Psycho-epistemology of Art

Mr Miller,
My point was not that Neates work ought to be considered great art (actually
I find the palette and figuration to be derivative of Francis Bacon and not
as interesting), but simply that an artist to whom one would apply the label
'modern (if not contemporary) artist' is working within the well defined
codes of iconographic representation. Everything from the relief created by
the cardboard, to the pose of the figure, to the facial expression, would
find a home in the cottage industry of outsider art which is icon painting.

I am by no means an expert, and perhaps someone here could say something
more intelligent than I am able to on this subject.


On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Chris Miller <[email protected]>wrote:

> >You may want to have a look at the work of Adam Neate
> http://www.elmslesters.co.uk/index.php?pid=13&subid=26
> He has done some work that focuses on this.
>
>
> Thanks, I.A.
>
>
> Here's something like an icon from Alexander Dubovyk:
>
>
>
> http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_u_KW4nuKg9k/SoqheIarsvI/AAAAAAAAKsA/bKFMayqZf9U/s16
> 00-h/alexander.jpg
>
> If he had thrown a few saintly figures into that "Golgotha", it would
> belong
> in a church.
>
>
> But the Neate pieces, even the figures with halos, would be much better
> located in a bar somewhere between  a college campus and a maximum security
> prison.
>
> The two artists express a very different "sense of life" as Ayn Rand would
> say.
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Just drop it. Click here for free information on weight loss surgery!
>
> http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxRbzsANV4BpJsmxp8SeMBHce
> iJBw4iz44kEcYecQFvmodb3SxSYRC/

Reply via email to